And in Oakland, does Jon Gruden stick around instead of getting traded to Tampa Bay and wining a Super Bowl there? Everyone acts like they didnt drive down the field and have Vinatieri kick one of the most difficult field goals in league history, followed by driving down the field in OT to get another score. It prohibits runners and defenders from lowering their heads and striking a forcible blow with. But they didnt win. Whoever devised the Tuck Rule was drinking more than thier fair share of Scotch that day. Great teams overcome adversity. section: | slug: tom-brady-admits-controversial-tuck-rule-game-play-might-have-been-a-fumble-and-not-an-incomplete-pass | sport: football | route: article_single.us | remember its the same ref that was in for the ravens vs raiders championship a year before when that fat lose goose broke gannons arm so the raiders would lose Other football associations rule it an incomplete pass or a fumble. With 1:12 left in the first quarter, a 15-yard fair-catch interference penalty against Patriots defensive back Je'Rod Cherry at the end of Ken Walter's 39-yard punt gave Oakland a first down at midfield, where they drove to a 70 lead on Gannon's 13-yard touchdown pass to James Jett. Put an asterisk next to it. Losing on a fluke (and possibly bad) call is much more. It's not that the tuck rule is bad (that's a whole other thing I'm not gonna go into), it's that the call itself was shit. Correct call. February 1, 2022 8:06 am PT. I still say he had a personal stake in a Raider victory. Anything else? The tuck rule was called in Week 2 of an NFL regular season matchup on September 23, 2001, between the New England Patriots and the New York Jets. So if they rule its not a fumble then it should be ruled intentional grounding, with loss of that down, and ball placed at the spot of where the ball hits the ground. Jan. 19, 2002 is a date that will always live in infamy for Raiders coach Jon Gruden. The Tuck Rule was first enforced in 2001 when Vinny Testaverde faced the Patriots. If he gets hit while attempting to throw a pass then it would be incomplete as long as the ball goes forward. If the player loses possession of the ball during an attempt to bring it back toward his body, or if the player loses possession after he has tucked the ball into his body, it is a fumble. Anyway, the Raiders scored a TD, beat the Patriots and went on to win the Super Bowl. "[2] Them I feel sorry for. 'I was self destructive' - Kelly Holmes opens up on depression, identity crisis and growing up in care in emotional post, Kurt Zouma set to play for West Ham as David Moyes calls him 'a really good lad' despite 'diabolical' cat kick video, Chelsea sweating on Tuchel Covid test result with private jet on standby to fly him to Club World Cup final vs Palmeiras, Seven times WWE turned real as stars got angry and REALLY attacked opponents including Brock Lesnar and Andre The Giant, 'He wronged me' - Eddie Hall reveals how 'hatred' of Game of Thrones' Hafthor Bjornsson started ahead of boxing fight, Chelsea star Jorginho out for revenge against Palmeiras in Club World Cup final - the team who rejected him as a kid, Aaron Ramsdales brother explains Arsenal star's celebration after he taunts Wolves fans following win. Allen stated that he heard the Patriots' play call. - Very easy to determine what the Qbs intent was and what happened with instant replay. The rule has been derided, but the call itself, was to the letter of the rule. (Of course raiders sold the most merchandise back then and where a very popular team ..the league was not about to put NE in the superbowl they would have lost $$$ at the time), As far as the tuck rule.. I've heard it as week 2 and also your later game against the Jets. I love how people act like the Pats won against the Raiders only because of the tuck rule. Brady pump faked, never saw or felt woodson coming from behind. [3] The call was overturned upon review and ruled an incomplete pass, with the tuck rule cited. Wikipedia's page for your 2001 season says the latter, but your image above shows home jerseys (week two). St. Louis went 14-2 that season and was outscoring opponents by 14.3 points a game. While I'm not arguing with you, but I know the general thing now is that if there's not enough evidence but only a sliver of evidence to overturn it, they won't. Most Patriots fans will even admit they were given a gift on that play. Raiders were the best team in the NFL from 2000-2003 WOULD OF BEEN LONGER PERHAPS IF IT WASNT FOR THAt SCUMBAG! You can't see the line of scrimmage on the field. helmet to helmet hits/ ridicilous fines/bs suspensions! 1-seeded Steelers to even get to the Super Bowl. The Rams probably win another title, adding to the legacy of the Greatest Show on Turf. It's been 10 years since the infamous tuck rule game, and the rule itself reared its ugly . Though honestly, if the Patriots win it all this year, Ill be way over that as well. As a result, the original call was overturned, and the ball was given back to the Patriots, who subsequently moved the ball into field goal range. The Tuck Rule Victoria Saeli Sports 4.9 29 Ratings; A weekly football podcast hosted by Victoria (@dirtbagqueer) and Katie (@KatesOfHeaven). The Patriots should never had got that first Super Bowl. The season had been wild for the Patriots, who began the year 02 after veteran quarterback Drew Bledsoe suffered a sheared blood vessel in his chest[6] in the game against the New York Jets. On the field, referee Mike Carey ruled it a fumble. He is a PR machine for the NFL and nothing more. The rule was properly applied, period. Get over it, pathetic Raiders fans. The owners abolished the rule with a 291 vote, with Pittsburgh Steelers the only team to vote against. if 50 guys at the bar think it's a fumble, then it's a fumble. Tom Brady enjoyed a phenomenal 20 seasons with the New England Patriots.With a tenure that long, the future Hall of Fame quarterback made countless memories with the franchise. Whatever raider fans. Brought into the game in 1999, the 'tuck rule' was controversial from the very beginning. Register now! Whatever patriot fans. It sure looks like it did, or even got really really close, but there's no way you can say it 100% didn't touch it, therefore you couldn't be able to overturn the call. Bill Belichick should have to insult three teams in a season, one must be in the AFC East. No choice but to respect the officials probably correct decision. He's allowed only two challenges per game, but if both challenges are successful, he's given a third. [8], This was not the first time the Patriots had seen the tuck rule invoked in the 2001 NFL season. 4. Because I find it laughable to be told let it go by New England fans. The Raiders appeared to be dominating to this point of the game. Wow. If a QB stops his throwing motion and starts to protect the ball. lets 1)reinvent the rule book in the playoffs; 2) use the reinvention to OVERTURN the call on the field; 3) reward a qb who got made a fool out of on the play, and; 4) nullify an excellent defensive play. Thats what most Raiders fans cant ever grasp: it was not a bad call. And even if they got there, the high-powered Rams awaited. You had your chance the next season, and the Bucs beat you by 50 touchdowns Let's look at some more examples of Tuck Rule-type plays from last season with a prediction of how they will be called in 2013. Thank you. Tucker makes the case that there is a war against Christians happening in America on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight:' TUCKER CARLSON: You always imagine in your mind's eye that it's evil men who destroy . And how its also ignored that the Pats lost a game that same year in large part to the tuck rule being called in favor of the Jets I believe. Only once the forward motion of the arm is completed, and the ball tucked into the quarterback's body, would a subsequent loss of possession be considered a fumble. (#94 -> #33, for example). . raidernationbaby: It warms my heart to hear you say that. I would support a rule change, although it took me a long time to get to this point, Pereira said. It should have been inconclusive. I agree to receive the "Pick Six Newsletter" and marketing communications, updates, special offers (including partner offers), and other information from CBS Sports and the Paramount family of companies. If it goes against the Raiders, reverse the call on the field. avana capital corporation. After a video-replay review, referee Walt Coleman reversed the call, declaring the play an incomplete forward-pass and giving possession back to New England. It was a call that was made exactly in the context of the rule, an admittedly bad rule which the competition committee has never thought wise to change. Gruden was dismissive of Davis' views on the matter, and the subsequent breakdown in relations between owner and coach led to Gruden being traded to Tampa Bay and becoming their head coach in 2002. It would create fucking chaos 10x a game. So, either way, Grudens time in Oakland was likely over. Defies every logic. Were talking, of course, about the infamous Tuck Rule game, in which the New England Patriots, thanks to a late Tom Brady fumble being overturned because of an obscure rule, beat the Oakland Raiders to advance to the 2002 AFC Championship Game. The "tuck rule" grew in prominence in 2002, when an apparent Tom Brady fumble on this play was called back because of the rule. The rule means that a potentially key fumble could now be deemed an incomplete pass. In 2008, Brady suffered two torn ligaments during the Patriots' season-opening game with the Kansas City Chiefs. Vinny Testaverde drops back to pass and arm comes forward and he loses the ball. The Tuck rule should have never came into play. It would be the same as saying when a QB is handing off to a RB and the ball comes out, the QB is technically passing the ball to the RB so it should be an incomplete pass, also. Please explain Einstein how you can have an incomplete pass without first throwing the football? QBs dont deserve a free pass. No choice but to respect the officials probably correct decision. I have done this and Woodson blitzed off the corner, forced a fumble and greg beikert recovered it winning the game for the Raiders. The officials rule fumble. period. QB is trying to throw a screen pass, gets bumped, running back drops screen passfumble. During ESPN's new 30 for 30 documentary called, "The Tuck Rule", the future Hall of Fame quarterback admitted that if he didn't lead the New. Terry Kirby returned the ensuing kickoff 22 yards to the Oakland 37-yard line and the Raiders produced a 10-play, 43-yard drive to score on a 38-yard field goal from Sebastian Janikowski. The ball should not have to be loose in the act of passing for it to be ruled incomplete. (Gruden would return to the Raiders in 2018 after spending a stint as a broadcaster with ESPN.). Why? In the overtime, Vinatieri kicked a 23-yard field goal to win the game for the Patriots. But its not as if St. Louis would have replaced New England as the NFLs most successful organization. Before I continue, yes, the Tuck Rule made the difference in that game, for all of you Patriot fans out there. In the . Hearing Lewis say that the tuck rule is the only reason we know about a man who's won three Super Bowls, has twice been named NFL MVP (including the first-ever unanimous MVP), has made 10. Bad rule. (This was also the game in which Patriots quarterback Drew Bledsoe was injured by a hit from Mo Lewis, giving backup Tom Brady a chance to play.). Today marks the 15th anniversary of the most controversial use of replay in NFL history. When [an offensive] player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his arm starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body. In fact it is typically encountered about once a year by each team in the league. The most unnatural rule in football. This rule is fine, its only the whining fans of teams that are unable to do their jobs well enough to win that want this rule changed. The fact that so many Raider fans are still this upset tells me that things have evened out for that bad call in 1976. Kicker? I am truly staggered by the impeccable logic and flawless analytical acumen demonstrated by your post. An incomplete pass stops the clock and prevents the loss of yards from a sack. Tom Brady Reveals the Tuck Rule Saved His Starting Job With the New England Patriots: 'Probably the Backup QB Going Into 2002 The referee of that famous game was Walt Coleman, who has stood by that call for years. It's been nearly two decades since he walked out of a snow-covered Foxboro Stadium on the wrong end of a 16-13 overtime loss to the Patriots in the infamous "tuck rule" game during the 2001 . mrconnors says: To make the right call. If the decision had remained a fumble, it would have almost certainly sealed the game for Oakland. But then, they wont have anything to whine about for the next ten years.
